[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa Fe
Munter, Joel D wrote: >Seeing ebXML based services "registered" in a UDDI registry >(semi-private or the public UBR) and therefore discoverable in a demo >may go a long way toward eliminating some confusion. > I am not sure how showing ebXML artifacts registered in a non-ebXML Registry eliminates confusion regarding ebXML Registries role in web services. I would say your suggestion would further obfuscate the issue. That confusion, if it indeed exists, is best cleared by showing web services "registered" in an *ebXML Registry* (public or private). This is essentially what Joe was suggesting and I second his suggestion. > >The Technical note being drafted by Kibakura-san (Fujitsu) and being >discussed on the UDDI-spec dist list has come along way. I recommend >that you all read this and comment as you need to. > >Joel Munter, Intel >desk: 480.552.3076 >cell: 602.790.0924 > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM >To: Matthew MacKenzie >Cc: Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; OASIS regrep >Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa >Fe > >One way to help remedy this perception might be to present on >"Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry" at some of the Web >services conferences, such as Web Services One. > >Some other things that might help are the Best Practices paper on >registering Web services in an ebXML Registry (currently in progress), >and perhaps in the future a high-level mapping between the 2 registry >architectures (such as "ebXML Registry Classification is *roughly* >equivalent to UDDI categoryBag", "ebXML Organization is *roughly* >equivalent to UDDI businessEntity", etc.) > >Joe > >Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > > >>Anne, >> >>You're right on. ebXML != Web Services, at least not general >>perception wise. I'd like to see that changed somewhat, ebXML >>messaging is web services based, and ebXML registry is a web service. >> >>On Thursday, Jan 30, 2003, at 07:40 America/Vancouver, Anne Thomas >>Manes wrote: >> >> >> >>>I think RegRep's biggest issue is that it's so closely associated >>> >>> >with > > >>>ebXML, and when most people think of Web services, they think of >>> >>> >SOAP, > > >>>not >>>ebXML. Likewise, when they think of a Web services registry, they >>>think of >>>UDDI. >>> >>> > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC