[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts
I don't see how a sub team of registry for defining a serialization format for core components makes sense. Sure, we have the people who can get it done here, but it doesn't fit. We could always start Yet-Another-Oasis-TC... -Matt David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote: >Message text written by Matthew MacKenzie > > >I don't advocate people calling any home cooked XML or CSV a core >component in their XML registry...I think that will just muddy the waters. > ><<< > >Matt, > >FYI - there are a dozen registries out there already with their >own XML formats for content. > >Having the ATG specify XML for an OASIS Registry IMHO >is a fraught path. > >My suggestion is a sub-team of Registry - and we have a >collaborative effort between the concerned parties: > >My list would include UBL, CAM, UDDI, CCTS, ATG, and >then other OASIS TC's that want to liaise, along with >invite to OAGI and DISA X12 to have an observer each. > >DW. > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC