Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

<Excerpt>
> However, not every thing captured in that summary necessarily belongs in
> ebXML Registry TC. I propose we focus our discussion first by defining
> what is *IN* vs *OUT* of scope for the CC registration/discovery
> discussion. 
</Excerpt>

Thanks, Farrukh.  I'll take that one step further, in the interest of
keeping the discussion focused.  Here is a list of (what I believe is)
"everything captured in the summary":

- Registry metadata representations
- Defined binding to registry
- CAM
- Serialization format

Would you be willing to elaborate more on what you believe might be out
of scope?

- Joe

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> Rather than getting into a debate here about CAM, I believe that Content
> Assembly is outside the scope of ebXML Registry work and is the purview
> of content assembly tools. The only context I can think of for content
> assembly being discussed in ebXMl Registry TC is if there are any
> registry requirements necessary to support content assembly.
> 
> Joe's summary is an great attempt at capturing the key points of view.
> However, not every thing captured in that summary necessarily belongs in
> ebXML Registry TC. I propose we focus our discussion first by defining
> what is *IN* vs *OUT* of scope for the CC registration/discovery
> discussion. Right now I feel we are meandering a bit too wide.
> 
> Am I off base here?
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> >Dave,
> >
> >Note - UMM is nothing to do with CAM - since UMM is nothing
> >to do with XML - rather stating the obvious - like saying
> >fertilizer has nothing to do with Origami - but paper is made
> >from wood.
> >
> >Anyway - since UMM has nothing to do with the topic of
> >CC serialization - I'm at a loss to understand why you
> >said any of this at all.
> >
> >CAM is about content assembly - and therefore works
> >with Registry, Webservices, EDI, OAG BODs,
> >RosettaNet, UBL et al - and can be used with ebXML as
> >well.
> >
> >The fact that we can use it for CC serialization
> >is perfectly acceptable - just like using XPath,
> >XQuery or any other XML technology component.
> >
> >Cheers, DW.
> >====================================================
> >Message text written by Dave Welsh
> >
> >
> >>Rest looks fine except for the CAM stuff, which
> >>
> >>
> >is / has not been part of the ebXML work nor is it in line with the
> >UN/CEFACT UMM approach on that subject..<
> >
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------
> >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
> >

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano