Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

<Excerpt>
My 2 cents is that CC registration/discovery includes assembly 
</Excerpt>

+1

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Farrukh,
> 
> No issues.
> 
> My 2 cents is that CC registration/discovery includes
> assembly - unless you duck the BIE part of the spec' and
> do only atomic core components for now, or simply state
> that people provide their own assembly mechanism(s),
> and mention some of the options they have to achieve
> that:  schema / xslt / CAM / other scripts (Perl, JavaScript, et al).
> 
> Just focusing on atomic CC as a first step certainly will make
> life much easier for you.
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> ========================================================
> Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
> >Joe's summary is an great attempt at capturing the key points of view.
> However, not every thing captured in that summary necessarily belongs in
> ebXML Registry TC. I propose we focus our discussion first by defining
> what is *IN* vs *OUT* of scope for the CC registration/discovery
> discussion. Right now I feel we are meandering a bit too wide.
> 
> Am I off base here?
> <

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano