OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry


<Excerpt>
However in this instance seems like the 'customer'
is wanting us to say how the interface works so that
their choosen representation has the functionality
they need.
</Excerpt>

David, out of our "who would create a binding" option list (reproduced
below for reference) it appears that you favor (2), or perhaps (3) with
the Registry TC performing most of the work.

- Joe

<List>
(1) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a registry
binding
(2) The Registry TC is completely responsible for creating a registry
binding
(3) The CCTS Team and Registry TC are both responsible for
collaboratively creating a binding 
(4) An entirely different group (ex: a new OASIS TC) is responsible for
creating the binding (the OASIS "ebXML Registry Bindings TC"?)
(5) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a binding, and
the Registry TC acts in a consultant capacity
</List>


David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Farrukh,
> 
> I'm not sure if this is what they will accept, nor do I see
> this as optimal.  Maybe we're thinking about the same
> thing here...
> 
> My take on this would be that Registry TC has to
> pick up the ball of defining how to do this
> conceptually.  That the Registry TC therefore
> does that heavy lifting of defining the mechanisms
> and available tools.
> 
> Then the individual TC's are responsible for their
> own representations and serializations.
> 
> However in this instance seems like the 'customer'
> is wanting us to say how the interface works so that
> their choosen representation has the functionality
> they need.
> 
> We probably need a sub-task to define those
> big ticket items (I think Joe had something based
> from the CC spec' here summarized).
> 
> So I think your 5) below is some of this - but I think
> you are maybe pushing too much back into their
> court of completing the whole binding...
> 
> Or maybe I'm just drilling down into 5) here ; -)
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> =============================================
> Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
> >
> 5) The CCTS team is completely responsible for creating a registry
> binding and the registry TC is completely willing to act in a consulatnt
> capacity throughout the process and review ( and even approve if called
> upon) any resulting specs or Best Practice papers.
> <

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC