Re: [regrep] UDDI <> ebXML Reg use case

[Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>]

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:

>Farrukh,
>
>Just an FYI - superiority comes in many flavours - most of
>them subjective ; -)
>

David, Over the years I have come to live with the fact that you seem to 
mix up proper attributions often. The Quoted text I presented:

"client decided to use ebXML registry due to its superiority"

were Max Voskob's words not mine. I would never be so presumtuous ;-)

...

>
>What was I saying? - oh yes - "superiority" usually comes
>with the disclaimer  "your mileage may vary" ; -)
>
>Cheers, DW.
>
>p.s. On the topic of superiority - check out the 
>        Weapons of Mass Destruction website: http://www.womd.info/
>
>  Hint:  Look closely at what is returned.
>=============================================================
>Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
>  
>
>>>I'm working with web services (using C++, C#, .NET, Perl, etc), but 
>>>      
>>>
>>my client decided to use ebXML registry due to its superiority.
>>    
>>
>
>The very reason why your "client decided to use ebXML registry due to 
>its superiority" is because of the power and flexibility of the ebXML 
>Registry API. They would not have the same power and flexibility with a 
>UDDI API. If they could then they would just use UDDI.
><
>
>  
>

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh