RE: [regrep] "ebXML Registry and Web services" Federal Pilot

["Zachary Alexander" <zack2@cris.com>]

Joe,

I am familiar with the FEA and DOD's FMEA.  Do you think that it would
be a bad idea to define the architecture governance relationships?
Basically, show how this pilot is upholding the goals and tenants of the
GAO's Executive Guide: A Framework for assessing and improving
Enterprise Architecture Management. IMHO: Architecture governance should
lead to project transparency and both technical and IT Investment
efficiency. 

Zachary Alexander
the IT Investment Architect 
ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
http://www.ebTDesign.com
http://www.p2pspeaker.com
http://www.p2peconomy.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Farrukh Najmi
Cc: Zachary Alexander; 'Duane Nickull'; 'Breininger Kathryn R';
regrep@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Karl F Best (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: [regrep] "ebXML Registry and Web services" Federal Pilot

Great idea Farrukh - I have not. I *personally* am in the process of
learning more about FEA myself (I am in the early stages). My firm, Booz
Allen, has played a major role in defining it. Perhaps this can be an
objective of the pilot.

Joe

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >Zachary,
> >
> >There is already something known as the "Federal Enterprise
> >Architecture" (FEA). It is not yet complete, but I am certain that
all
> >pilots must comply to its high-level vision.
> >
> >Joe
> >
> >[1] http://www.feapmo.gov/fea.htm
> >
> >
> >
> Joe,
> 
> Have you done any analysis of how well ebXML registry V2.4 supports
FEA?
> If so please share your thoughts in a separate appropriately named
> thread. Thanks
> 
> --
> Farrukh