[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: FW: [regrep] Minutes from our telecon May 29th
Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: >Forwarded from Carl: > >-----Original Message----- >From: CarlMattocks [mailto:CarlMattocks@CHECKMi.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:33 AM >To: Breininger, Kathryn R >Subject: Re: [regrep] Minutes from our telecon May 29th > > >Kathryn : > > >To ensure the paper on Topic Maps & Registries contains information that is interesting to service developers - >please forward me a brief list of questions that you would like to see addressed. > >thanks > > > Carl, Thanks for stepping up to submit this paper. It will of interest to many people. Here are some thoughts on the content: -What are Topic Maps and what problems do they solve? -What are some advantages of using ebXML Registry to store and manage Topic Maps? -How can ebXML Registry be used to store and manage Topic Maps? -How can Topic Maps be used to classify RegistryObjects within an ebXML Registry? -Why is it better to use Topic Maps to classify RegistryObjects within an ebXML Registry? -What changes could ebXML Registry standard make to further improve support for Topic Maps in future? -What is the future direction of Topic Maps and how does it relate to or align with RDF + OWL from W3C Sematic Web Activity. Thanks again. -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]