Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

I think it's wonderful of Anne to help us out here. Thanks Anne!

Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> 
> I recommend using the proposed WSDL 1.2 binding (although it may go away in
> the future).
> IBM has published a schema for a MIME binding [1]. Thanks. I'll go revise
> the WSDL based on this info.
> 
> [1] http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>
> To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>
> Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>; "matt" <matt@yellowdragonsoft.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues
> 
> > Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> >
> > >Some questions and comments:
> > >
> > >
> > >If partContent is required to be included in the input message, why is it
> > >not included in the message structure?  Also, keep in mind that WS-I BP
> > >permits only one <part> on document/literal messages, so to be WS-I
> > >compliant, you would have to include it in the message structure.
> > >
> > >One reason why you might want to define multiple parts in a message
> > >definition is to define header or headerfault messages (which should
> always
> > >be defined as document/literal) -- but in that case you should always
> > >reference the specific part to be used in the <binding> elements. e.g.:
> > >
> > >   <message name='foo'>
> > >      <part name='body' element='foobody' />
> > >      <part name='header' element='fooheader' />
> > >      <part name='headerfault' element='fooheaderfault' />
> > >   </message>
> > >
> > >   <soap:body parts='body' use='literal' />
> > >   <soap:header message='tns:foo' part='header' use='literal' />
> > >   <soap:headerfault message='tns:foo' part='headerfault' use='literal'
> />
> > >
> > >Bottom line: the three messages containing partContent have to be fixed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Anne, the messages with partContent are those that are supposed to
> > support mime attachments. Clearly we seem to have lost
> >
> > <mime:multipartRelated>
> >
> > in the input and output element defs for these operations. I suspect
> > this was silently swallowed by a tool I used. I will doublecheck this.
> >
> > I know that WS-I BP does not touch attachments. Are there any other
> > considerations besides just following?
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20030611/#_mime
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Farrukh
> >
> >
> >
> > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.
> php
> >
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard