Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?

["Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>]

It is not a typo. It's meant to say that you probably want to use only one
registry for both UDDI and ebXML. This technical note explains how you can
use UDDI to register ebXML services. Likewise the ebXML team might want to
produce a similar technical note that explains how you can use regrep to
register WSDL services.

Anne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
To: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?


> In the UDDI Technical Note "UDDI as the registry for ebXML components"
> [1], the Problem statement (p.3) states:
>
> "This introduces significant concerns of cost and manageability, because
> ebXML and Web services impose separate infrastructure requirements and
> platform components."
>
> Is this entirely accurate, given that one can register and maintain Web
> services in an ebXML Registry? The entire Problem statement is
> reproduced below. I wonder if this is a typo.
>
> Joe
>
> 1.1 Problem statement
> Multiple consortia have initiated pilot projects using the ebXML
> framework for business-to-business transactions, while corporations have
> also begun adopting ebXML technologies for internal use. At the same
> time Web service technologies, which have significant momentum due to
> unprecedented industry support, are also being rolled out. This
> introduces significant concerns of cost and manageability, because ebXML
> and Web services impose separate infrastructure requirements and
> platform components.
>
> As a universal technology for publication and discovery of service
> metadata, UDDI allows the bridging of the two infrastructures by
> accommodating metadata registrations for Web services as well as ebXML
> framework components, enabling interoperability among trading partners
> using ebXML or Web services. However, a prescribed methodology of
> modeling services and components which are conformant to ebXML
> specifications is required to make interoperable solutions possible.
>
> [1]
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/draft/uddi-spec-tc-tn-udd
i-ebxml-20030508.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.
php