[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] UK Govt regrep requirements
David, I have raised the issue before, and you mentioned the CAM specification. It was certainly not clear to me how this solves the problem. That is why I was thinking of preparing something that went into more detail on the requirement and current solution. What I would hope to take away from that is not "regrep can do a part and CAM does the rest" but *how* they can be used to do it. I suspect that nobody not on these committees could do that from the information currently available. Or, at least, not without three months work. Regards Paul Spencer > -----Original Message----- > From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info] > Sent: 24 September 2003 15:42 > To: Paul Spencer > Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [regrep] UK Govt regrep requirements > > > Paul, > > Following on from Farrukh's comments - the assembly requirements > are certainly covered by the OASIS CAM specification and are > designed to work with a registry as the numerous sample CAM > templates illustrate. > > More information on CAM is available from: > > http://cam.swiki.net > > and I would direct you specifically to the PPT slides showing > the architecture for registry driven assembly that are > available there. > > Thanks, DW. > ============================================================= > Quoting Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>: > > > Sorry I have not been as active here as I would like. For those > who don't > > know, I advise various parts of the UK Government on XML. Unfortunately, > > nobody here is currently prepared to spend money on registries, but I am > > working on this. My reason for joining this group was to represent UK > > Government requirements in my spare time - something I have > signally failed > > to do so far. > > > > I recently did some work for the MOD here, spending two days > turning their > > core schema (a collection of complex data types) into a repository of > > fully-versioned types from which schemas can be automatically generated. > > This is linked to their existing data dictionary through IDs > and ASP code. > > > > Whilst not a long-term solution, this has clarified the benefits of a > > registry to parts of the MOD and elsewhere in Government and flushed out > > some additional requirements. I now have permission to present on this > > project and to talk to the regrep TC about it. I am currently > preparing a > > presentation that must be complete by October 14th. As part of > a telecon, I > > would be happy to make this available and talk through it. > > > > What I would like to get out of this is: > > > > * does the existing reg/rep spec meet this requirement? > > > > * if not, is the TC interested in this requirement for a future release? > > > > * Do any of the current implementations meet this requirement? > > > > Note that the MOD is a simple case of the general UK Govt requirement. I > > imagine that the needs are common across most Governments - it > will just be > > that some don't realise it yet. > > > > Regards > > > > Paul Spencer > > Director > > Boynings Consulting Ltd > > http://www.boynings.co.uk > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the > roster of the > > OASIS TC), go to > > http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > > > > > http://drrw.net > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the > roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_ workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]