[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Re: Republica Case Study (Was: Re: [regrep] Web Siteupdate request)
I was referring to Diego's earlier comment: <Quote> I think you're absolutelly right on making clear that it is not necessarily aligned with ebXML work. I'm working on the changes and I've added the following disclaimer: "The project was not fully aligned with OASIS ebXML Standards and should not be used as a reference implementation. Rather, this case study should be read as a report of a successful experience based on ebXML Standards. Furthermore, this case study should inspire similar experiences to take place and to be shared throughout the ebXML community. See section 3 for used specifications and degrees of adoption." </Quote> Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > ><Quote1> > >"The project was not fully aligned with OASIS ebXML Standards > ></Quote1> > > > >With all due respect to the hard work that I'm sure went into this, it > >still puzzles me as to why OASIS would post something that is not in > >line with the standards that have been created by an OASIS TC. I don't > >believe that W3C posts products implementations that do not conform to > >their Recommendations. > > > I respectfully disagree with your statements above. > > The work done by Republica is completely inline with the OASIS ebXML > Registry version 2.1 standard and shows a fine example (case study) of > how to apply an ebXML Registry to manage core components. The work > predates the good work done in CCRIM which is still not available as a > public document. Even when it is, based on current plans AFAIK it will > be a non-normative technical note. It will not be an OASIS standards > unless I missed a decision somewhere along the way. > > IMO, the Republica Case Study is not even obligated to be saying > anything about CCRIM but I think it should say something along the lines > of deferring to it when it is out. > > Diego has offered to do these changes to allay the concerns raised. > > I am not getting what the fuss is about. What OASIS standards are being > violated? If anything this is one of the most sophisticated case studies > of ebXML Registry specs that I have seen to date. > > I would like to respectfully request that Diego put edit the document > based on input received by a set deadline and then we put the matter up > for vote by the TC. > > FWIW, my vote is a resounding *YES* on the document whenever it is up > for a vote. > > Thanks Diego for your valuable contributions. > > -- > Farrukh
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]