[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] ebXML and Web Services: Is this a fair assessment?
Kathryn and David (or is it Sally and Duane?;), Thanks to both of you for your very helpful responses. Joe David RR Webber wrote: > > Kathryn, > > I think some of this history stuff is best left in the past! ; -) > > We had some real fun in those early Registry meetings!! > > Anyway - the main thrust and change occured when Bob Sutor decided > to launch the UDDI work separate from ebXML and shortly after that > IBM changed its status in ebXML from active to passive. > > The W3C also has some good notes on the history of the term "web services" > and work that got started within the W3C. > > BTW - there was no technical reasons why this divergence through UDDI took > place. > > DW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com> > To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>; > <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:56 PM > Subject: RE: [regrep] ebXML and Web Services: Is this a fair assessment? > > Joe, > Here is a little background: > The Registry TC was originally formed in 1999 and developed an ebXML > registry and Repository technical specification v1.0 in May 2000. Version > 1.1 was published December 20, 2000, and was discussed in Vancouver BC in > February 2001. I think Sally is the only TC member who has been with the TC > since the version 1.0 version was done in May 2000. So, historically > speaking, your first statement is probably accurate (not knowing when web > services became prominent...). > > David's comments also provide additional clarity. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:39 PM > To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [regrep] ebXML and Web Services: Is this a fair assessment? > > All, > > I was not involved in ebXML until after May 2001 (although I monitered > various listservs prior to that), so I don't have as solid an > appreciation as I would like regarding ebXML and Web Services. Can > someone please tell me if the following is a fair assessment - my > intention is to be as accurate as possible, and not controversial (I've > numbered the points below for easy referral): > > (1) The ebXML initiative began before Web Services became prominent; > therefore there are many aspects of ebXML that do not utilize Web > Services to as full a potential as they may have otherwise. > > (2) For example, the emerging OASIS Web Services Business Process > Execution Language (WS BPEL) is centered on the Web Services hierarchy > presented in WSDL (portType, operation, message, etc.) while the ebXML > Business Process Schema Specification (BPSS) is centered on the concept > of "business documents". > > (3) An exception to this is the ebXML Messaging Service (ebMS) > specification, whose foundation is SOAP. > > (4) However, many of the ebXML specifications have incorporated Web > Services since their original version - one example is the inclusion of > a SOAP interface to ebXML Registry in its 2.0 version. > > Thanks, > Joe > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]