Re: [egov] Re: [regrep] Re: [egov] Re: [regrep] [Fwd: ebXML withZ39.50 -- help needed!]

["Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>]

Acknowledged OWL and Topic Map structures would need to be represented in
an Information Model. Since the biggest impact would be on 'query'
capabilities I think they need to be tightly bound. How about a Discovery
sub-Tc with two deliverables which benefits from two heads ?

<quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
> (Removing egov TC)
>
> Carl Mattocks wrote:
>
>>If the work of the ebXMLRegistry Query sub-team can be expanded to
>>consider the value of XQuery, OWL, Topic Maps, Z39.50 / SRW (
>>http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/index.html ) I would be willing
>>to one of its co-heads .
>>
>>
> The query sub-teams charter is to deal with issues directly related to
> the QueryManager interface of the registry.
> As such XQuery, Z39.50 fit well. OWL and Topic Maps have an important
> supporting role to play in queries but are central to the core
> information model. I would feel more comfortable having those two items
> in an Information Model sub-team (which I would be willing to chair).
>
> I definitely think we need to activate our query sub-team. I think
> Carl's background in these areas would be a very good match for leading
> this important sub-team.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>
>
>


-- 
Carl Mattocks CEO CHECKMi
Operational Intelligence OEM
-------------------------------
e-Business Agents
Semantically Smart Compendiums
-------------------------------
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com