[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] V3.0 of ebXML for SOA
Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > It was an example. Would it make sense to have an "ebXML architecture" > which could be interpreted to allow using UDDI, SOAP and BPEL instead > of ebReg+ebMS+ebBP? I think not. Aah! I understand and agree completely. Your statement "ebxml-bp should be specified over BPEL" threw me off as I incorrectly interpretted it as you suggesting the ebxml-bp should be re-define to layer on top of BPEL. Needless to say I was surprised. Thanks for clearing up things and restoring my sanity ;-) -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]