OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [OASIS members] Call For Presentations: OASIS Symposium]


Thanks David - just looking to see how much of a stretch (or not) that
was. 

This has proven my theory that some folks may be stretched to determine
whether or not their particular OASIS standards may "fit the bill" for
this event. Perhaps the best policy may be "if in doubt, submit an
abstract". Or, OASIS could provide a list (even a sample list) of TCs
that this event may be applicable to?

Joe

David RR Webber wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> The OASIS verbage mentions two areas where CAM provides
> significant value:
> 
> > > > * At the application layer (e.g. transaction protocols);
> 
> CAM provides neutral way to describe the transaction formats
> and
> 
> > > > We define "reliable" to mean that implementing one or more of these
> > > > technologies in an infrastructure removes some of the burden of
> ensuring
> > > > application integrity from software programmers and architects.
> > > >
> 
> CAM is especially important to ensuring that application integrity can
> be proved and validated - and tested before production begins -
> AND its also designed to make it easy
> for programmers and architects to work off the same script.
> 
> I don't think I'm completely off-base here - the webservice flavour
> obviously looks at the bit-n-bytes - but what is actually being
> transported as transactions is the meat!
> 
> WRT the registry - that then provides the means to share and
> discover those definitions, and provide the metadata dictionary
> underneath.
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> 
> > > > Overview
> > > >
> > > > Many different (and partially interchangeable) technologies are
> proposed
> > > > or available to increase the reliability of XML-based messaging and
> > > > networking infrastructure.  These include technologies applied:
> > > >
> > > > * At the transport layer (e.g. reliable messaging specifications);
> > > > * At the application layer (e.g. transaction protocols);
> > > > * At intermediate levels (e.g. routing, point-to-point compared to
> > > > end-to-end);
> > > > * By using Message-Oriented Middleware as a carrier for XML messages.
> > > >
> > > > We define "reliable" to mean that implementing one or more of these
> > > > technologies in an infrastructure removes some of the burden of
> ensuring
> > > > application integrity from software programmers and architects.
> > > >
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
> Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [OASIS members] Call For Presentations: OASIS
> Symposium]
> 
> > <Quote>
> > I certainly think that OASIS CAM combined with Registry is a strong fit
> > here - particularly in the information integration arena.
> > </Quote>
> >
> > Hmmm...how does this combination "increase the reliability of XML-based
> > messaging and networking infrastructure", as described in the call for
> > presentations?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > David RR Webber wrote:
> > >
> > > Joe,
> > >
> > > I certainly think that OASIS CAM combined with Registry is a strong fit
> > > here - particularly in the information integration arena.
> > >
> > > The only issue is travel - since XML Europe is also in the
> > > same timeframe.
> > >
> > > We may have to send surrogate robotic presenters to New Orleans!
> > >
> > > Cheers, DW.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> > > To: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:04 PM
> > > Subject: [regrep] [Fwd: [OASIS members] Call For Presentations: OASIS
> > > Symposium]
> > >
> > > > Upon reading this announcement, I immediately began to consider the
> > > > OASIS TCs that this announcement might best pertain to. Several TCs
> > > > immediately came to mind, namely SAML, WS-Security, and WSRM. For some
> > > > others, it was not so clear.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have a good idea as to whether or not our Registry TC
> could
> > > > apply to this in a direct way? If not, perhaps indirectly?
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps OASIS could provide a list of TCs that would be most pertinent
> > > > for this call?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Joe
> > > >
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: [OASIS members] Call For Presentations: OASIS Symposium
> > > > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:19:55 -0500
> > > > From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
> > > > Reply-To: karl.best@oasis-open.org
> > > > Organization: OASIS
> > > > To: members@lists.oasis-open.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> > > >
> > > > The OASIS Symposium on Reliable Infrastructures for XML
> > > > April 26th and 27th, 2004 in New Orleans, Louisiana
> > > >
> > > > Call for Presentations
> > > >
> > > > OASIS, the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information
> > > > Standards, invites you to submit a proposal for a presentation, panel
> > > > discussion or tutorial for the OASIS Symposium on Reliable
> > > > Infrastructures for XML. The goals of the symposium are to:
> > > >
> > > > * Provide a forum for OASIS Technical Committee members to exchange
> > > > ideas and present results of ongoing work, works-in-progress, etc.;
> > > > * Identify areas where coordination between standards efforts is
> needed
> > > > to promote interoperability;
> > > > * Identify unaddressed topics where standards development is needed;
> > > > * Enable outside experts to present issues / opportunities to OASIS
> > > > members.
> > > >
> > > > The symposium will be followed by two days available to OASIS
> Technical
> > > > Committees, Joint Committees and Member Sections for face-to-face
> > > > working sessions. The OASIS Annual General Meeting will also be held
> in
> > > > conjunction with the symposium.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Overview
> > > >
> > > > Many different (and partially interchangeable) technologies are
> proposed
> > > > or available to increase the reliability of XML-based messaging and
> > > > networking infrastructure.  These include technologies applied:
> > > >
> > > > * At the transport layer (e.g. reliable messaging specifications);
> > > > * At the application layer (e.g. transaction protocols);
> > > > * At intermediate levels (e.g. routing, point-to-point compared to
> > > > end-to-end);
> > > > * By using Message-Oriented Middleware as a carrier for XML messages.
> > > >
> > > > We define "reliable" to mean that implementing one or more of these
> > > > technologies in an infrastructure removes some of the burden of
> ensuring
> > > > application integrity from software programmers and architects.
> > > >
> > > > The OASIS Symposium is focused on exploring the current state of these
> > > > technologies and exploring areas where open standards are needed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Instructions
> > > >
> > > > The symposium program committee invites you to submit a proposal for a
> > > > presentation, panel discussion or tutorial that addresses technologies
> > > > and standards for reliable XML infrastructures.
> > > >
> > > > Presentations should be 30 minutes long including question and answer.
> > > > Sessions will consist of related presentations, ending with a
> > > > question-and-answer session directed to the presenters.
> > > >
> > > > Panel sessions should be 60 minutes long. Proposals for panels should
> > > > include the topic, 3-to-4 potential panelists (name and/or role) and
> > > > proposed format (e.g. Q&A, short presentations).
> > > >
> > > > Tutorials should be 1/2 day sessions.  Tutorial proposals should state
> > > > intended audience and learning objectives.
> > > >
> > > > Proposals should address topics in reliability as applied to XML-based
> > > > communications at the technology and implementation levels, ideally
> > > > driven by usage scenarios. Special consideration will be given to
> > > > proposals that:
> > > >
> > > > * Compare and contrast multiple related technologies (clear
> comparisons
> > > > of published and forthcoming XML transaction protocols) with a view
> > > > toward guidance for application architects;
> > > > * Support and consider decisions about choice of appropriate
> > > > technologies (e.g. use of reliable messaging and simpler protocols
> > > > rather than transactional termination protocols);
> > > > * Place OASIS technologies in a broader context of competing or
> > > > complementary specifications (e.g. relating OASIS work to the variety
> of
> > > > published reliable messaging specifications);
> > > > * Consider alternative approaches to transaction management (e.g.
> local
> > > > rollback versus compensation-based protocols);
> > > > * Compare reliability techniques for environmental models containing
> > > > benign threats versus malign threats;
> > > > * Consider techniques for ensuring accountability of origin and
> receipt;
> > > > * Discuss the impact of digital signatures and encryption on
> reliability
> > > > techniques.
> > > >
> > > > OASIS will publish proceedings of the symposium. Authors should
> arrange
> > > > for any necessary releases for publication prior to submission of
> their
> > > > proposal.
> > > >
> > > > To submit a proposal, please send the following information by email
> to
> > > > symposium@oasis-open.org:
> > > >
> > > > * The full contact details (name, affiliation, email, phone, postal
> > > > address) of one presenter who will act as the primary contact for the
> > > > proposal or panel discussion;
> > > > * The full list of authors;
> > > > * A 1-page abstract outlining the subject and key points of your
> > > > proposal, panel discussion or tutorial.
> > > >
> > > > All submissions will be acknowledged.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Important dates
> > > >
> > > > Symposium                   26th and 27th April 2004
> > > > Location                    New Orleans
> > > > Proposals Due               9 February 2004
> > > > Notification to submitters  15 March 2004
> > > > Materials Due               12 April 2004
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Program Committee
> > > >
> > > > The Program Committee is the OASIS Technical Advisory Board (TAB):
> > > >
> > > > * Karl Best, OASIS
> > > > * Derek Coleman, HP
> > > > * William Cox, BEA
> > > > * Chet Ensign, LexisNexis
> > > > * Chris Ferris, IBM
> > > > * Eduardo Gutentag, Sun
> > > > * Jackson He, Intel
> > > > * Tim Moses, Entrust
> > > > * Krishna Sankar, Cisco
> > > > * Pete Wenzel, SeeBeyond
> > > >
> > > > For further information, send email to symposium@oasis-open.org.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________
> > > > This email list is used solely by OASIS for official consortium
> > > > communications. Opt-out requests may be sent to
> > > > member_services@oasis-open.org, however, all members are strongly
> > > > encouraged to maintain a subscription to this list.
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
> of
> > > the OASIS TC), go to
> > >
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
> the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> >
> >


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]