OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] [Semantic Content Management SC] Suggested reading


IMHO, absolutely yes.

Joe

Zachary Alexander wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Should the OWL-S 1.0 Release documents be added to our list of suggested
> reading?  The Technical Overview and Relationship to Existing Industry
> Web Services Efforts seem to be the two that make the most sense.  There
> are number of ontologies but they may contain both OWL Full and OWL DL
> content.
> 
> [1] http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0
> 
> Zachary Alexander
> The IT Investment Architect
> ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
> http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com
> http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:20 PM
> To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [regrep] [Semantic Content Management SC] Suggested reading
> 
> It is great to see all the good discussion around the Semantic Content
> Management, Ontologies, Topic Maps, OWL, RDF etc.
> 
> Many of us are ramping up on our knowledge of the Semantic Web
> technologies. Lets use this thread to share interesting and relevant
> links that help our collective understanding:
> 
> Carl had got the ball rolling with several good links at:
> 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200312/msg00060.html
> 
> Among Carl's suggested list, the Ontology 101 is a good place to start.
> You may want to download Protege 2.0 beta from
> http://protege.stanford.edu and the OWL plug in to get a more hands on
> feel if you wish.
> 
> The official W3C OWL documents are listed at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-owl-features-20031215/#s1.1
> 
> I suggest reading them in following order:
> 
> OWL Overview, OWL Guide, OWL Reference (skip OWL Semantics and Abstract
> Syntax, OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases).
> 
> The last document OWL Use Cases and Requirements looks useful though I
> have not read it yet.
> 
> Please add more useful links in response to this thread.
> 
> Once again please vote if you have not done so already on the SCM SC:
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/ballot.php?id=304&;
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]