[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] UDDI FAQ entry on ebXML Registry
"Federation" is rather overloaded and I'd prefer not using it as we probably mean different things by it - i.e. v3 from our perspective implements federation a fact that some would likely debate. -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 07:07 To: carlmattocks@checkmi.com Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org; Luc Clément Subject: Re: [regrep] UDDI FAQ entry on ebXML Registry Carl Mattocks wrote: >Could we state in both FAQs that - UDDI & ebXMLRegistry can be used as >federated registries ? > > I do not believe that is the case. UDDI TC is working on federation features for UDDI V4 AFAIK. Currently I believe UDDI model for ditributed registries is to use transaction replication. I would suggest that we not get into that level of detail for this FAQ question. Luc, please feel free to comment as you see fit. -- Regards, Farrukh ><quote who="Farrukh Najmi"> > > > >>The UDDI TC has the following question in their FAQ: >> >>8. How does UDDI compare with the work of the OASIS >>ebXML Registry TC? >> >>I was helping Luc scrub the answer to the question. With Luc's >>permission I post the latest answer below. >>The description below seems reasonable to me. Does any one have any >>comments? >> >>My thanks to Luc for his responsiveness on this subject. >> >>BTW maybe we should consider having the exact same question and answer >>in our FAQ (with Luc's permission)? >> >>-- >>Regards, >>Farrukh >> >> >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]