[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [regrep-semantic] IBM BI-ICS]
Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > David RR Webber wrote: > > >Joe, > > > >OK - despite Scott saying that BC-ICS is not IBMs answer to CAM, > >the fact remains that if you have CAM, which we do, CAM is available > >in open source - and an OASIS spec' - then there is absolutely no > >earthly reason why you would want to do ICS instead. > > > > > +1 > > We should not even consider a spec until it is in an open standards body. Farrukh, could you please elaborate on your meaning of "consider"? Separately: I do think that it's wise for technical committees (OASIS and beyond) to be aware of what is out there, and - out of that set - what is likely to be advanced into an open standards consortium in the future, and how likely. Joe > Next we should not encourage specs that duplicate existing specs within > open standards orgs. > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]