[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [regrep-semantic] IBM BI-ICS]
David RR Webber wrote:___________________________
Anne,
There certainly are no hard and fast rules around standards.
Depends on the domain in which you function of course - in the US
federal domain, we point to OMB Circular A-119[1], which defines what a
"voluntary consensus standard (VCS)" is.
Joe
[1] http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a119/a119.html
However - I suspect we often clarify this by using metrics
that denote when things are clearly NOT an open standard -
such as license fees, use agreements and solely own
implementations. One also expects good neighbour
behaviours and contributions to the better good - rather
than hidden agendas and clear attempts to bait-and-hook
or displace one practice with another.
So - when something is obviously the equivalent of open
source - and indeed much open source itself - then it
has the possiblity of becoming recognized as a de facto
standard. I'd say your WS-Addressing is looking
like coming under this umbrella.
The one that I always like to reference is PKZIP of
course that is the exception that proves the rule(s).
Thanks, DW.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>
To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>; "Chiusano Joseph"
<chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Cc: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>; <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [regrep-semantic] IBM BI-ICS]
For the most part I prefer to reference standards works as opposed tothey
private works, but I make exception for some things -- especially when
provide essential functionality AND when they contain an open copyrighthttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnglobspec/html/ws-addressing.asp
notice. Such is the case with WS-Addressing.
WS-Addressing provides essential functionality -- a standard mechanism to
reference a Web service endpoint. In my opinion, it's one of the most
critical WS specifications published last year. I am not aware of any
competitive effort that is currently defining this type of mechanism.
And I suggest you read the copyright notice [1]. It the most open spec
notice I've ever seen.
[1]
Annewhich is
At 11:01 PM 3/18/2004, Monica J. Martin wrote:
Chiusano: I completely agree - a perfect example is WS-Addressing,
.php.referred to in multiple emerging open specifications (too numerous to
mention).
mm1: WS-Addressing is an emerging specification. It is not open (only
available on a web site).
mm2: Correction, I misread your sentence Joe. There are at least two
specifications in an open standards organization that do reference
WS-Addressing. Thanks.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~the OASIS TC), go to
Anne Thomas Manes
VP & Research Director
Burton Group
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]