[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Deadline Tomorrow] Re: [regrep] XML2004 abstractdeadline: May 7
Chiusano Joseph wrote: >Excellent - recommend clarifying early on (or in the title) that "ISO/TS >15000 based Registry / Repository" is synonymous to OASIS/ebXML >Registry, and using one consistent reference throughout. Encountering >"OASIS/ebXML Registry" late in the abstract could throw the reader into >an intended subject shift. > > To add to Joe's thought... I think we should replace "Registry / Repository" in title with "ebXML Registry". Name recognition is important. I would not suggest using "ISO 15000 based Registry / Repository" as it is not our name. Great looking abstract Carl. Thanks and best of luck. >Joe > >Carl Mattocks wrote: > > >>Here is the proposed 500 word abstract addressing Semantic Content >>Management Using ebXML Registry .. >>nit picking comments welcome .. >> >>title = Managing Medical Ontologies using OWL and Registry / Repository >> >>The Semantic Web is about the autonomous discovery and assembly of >>dis-tributed remote resources. Which is based on the automated sharing of >>meta-data terms across Web applications that provide a common approach for >>the discovery, understanding, and exchange of semantics. This presentation >>out-lines how the e-health knowledge embedded in Upper and Lower >>Ontologies support the web service discovery task that may involve the >>interaction of in-dependent resources from different domains and owned by >>different entities. In particular, it identifies the challenges of >>development and publishing re-quired by agents representing the >>stakeholders that use OWL ontologies to both assist the discovery process >>and also to pull the services together into a workflow. Such as, the >>semantically enriched web services being developed for ARTEMIS an >>international project which provides interoperability of medical >>information systems. >> >>The audience will understand how specific knowledge management chal-lenges >>are addressed including - how using ontologies for managing content >>ensures a high level of relevance for the knowledge that is being >>associated with the semantic annotations. Given, documents can be viewed >>(and there-fore indexed) according to different views of the world, and >>assigned different classification schemes used for different purposes. >>Further, why a multidi-mensional view of the world requires use of several >>ontologies, not as a single classification hierarchy, but as a product of >>orthogonal hierarchies. Given (1) a large overlap among the subject fields >>involved and (2) a large number of codes and rubrics, typically in the >>order of magnitude of 10000-100000 entries, in commonly used >>terminological systems; >> >>Additionally, participants will learn how the enterprise content >>management capabilities of ISO/TS 15000 based Registry / Repository are >>used to met the challenges. For instance, although the ISO/TS 15000 >>standard does not ex-plicitly reference semantic content capabilities the >>session will shown how it is already being used to associate web services >>with OWL ontologies. Specifically, in addition to explaining the approach >>used by the Artemeis project, the speaker will show how the Mayo Clinic >>has successfully used the Registry / Repository for their Ontological >>investigations. Referencing, how the Electronic Health Record (EHR) is >>defined by two ontological levels. (1) Level One On-tology represents the >>high-level classes and relationships for the entire longi-tudinal HER (the >>classes are domain independent); (2) Level Two ontology represents >>clinical concepts in the form of classes and the relationships be-tween >>those classes; (3) Classes in the Level Two ontology can be repre-sented >>both through its relationships with the classes of the Level One >>ontol-ogy, and through it’s relationships with the classes in the Level >>Two ontology. Finally, the attendees will be given a brief status report >>outlining the progress of the OASIS EbXML Registry / Repository Semantic >>Content Management SC effort focused on enabling the creation of a >>repository of ontologies. De-scriptions provided include how such a >>repository would facilitate ontology discovery and encourage reuse across >>enterprises. Plus, how the logical con-sistency of ontologies can be >>checked with a reasoner, and implicit knowledge can be inferred for these >>ontologies using queries employing semantic terms >> >><quote who="Chiusano Joseph"> >> >> >>>Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for abstracts >>>(non-late-breaking) for XML 2004 is tomorrow, Fri., 5/7/04. >>> >>> >>> >>>>Here are some ideas we been considering recently in various forums: >>>> >>>>-Semantic Content Management Using ebXML Registry (present work of the >>>>SCM SC, Carl Mattocks, Farrukh, ....) >>>>Carl, please confirm if you can take ownership of this? >>>> >>>>-Vocabulary Management Using ebXML Registry (present the work of the UK >>>>egov pilot, Paul Spencer, Farrukh, Duane, ....) >>>>Duane, please confirm if you can take ownership of this per our >>>>discussions at Amsterdam? >>>> >>>> >>-- >>Carl Mattocks >> >>co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC >>co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC >>CEO CHECKMi >>v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 >>www.CHECKMi.com >>Semantically Smart Compendiums >>(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >> > > > -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]