RE: [regrep] [Deadline Tomorrow] Re: [regrep] XML2004 abstract deadline: May 7

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

Agreed.  The titles of the ISO 15000 parts all include "ebXML", so it
should be included here.   

-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 12:11 PM
To: carlmattocks@checkmi.com
Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] [Deadline Tomorrow] Re: [regrep] XML2004 abstract
deadline: May 7


Excellent - recommend clarifying early on (or in the title) that "ISO/TS
15000 based Registry / Repository" is synonymous to OASIS/ebXML
Registry, and using one consistent reference throughout. Encountering
"OASIS/ebXML Registry" late in the abstract could throw the reader into
an intended subject shift.

Joe

Carl Mattocks wrote:
> 
> Here is the proposed 500 word abstract addressing Semantic Content 
> Management Using ebXML Registry .. nit picking comments welcome ..
> 
> title = Managing Medical Ontologies using OWL and Registry / 
> Repository
> 
> The Semantic Web is about the autonomous discovery and assembly of 
> dis-tributed remote resources. Which is based on the automated sharing

> of meta-data terms across Web applications that provide a common 
> approach for the discovery, understanding, and exchange of semantics. 
> This presentation out-lines how the e-health knowledge embedded in 
> Upper and Lower Ontologies support the web service discovery task that

> may involve the interaction of in-dependent resources from different 
> domains and owned by different entities. In particular, it identifies 
> the challenges of development and publishing re-quired by agents 
> representing the stakeholders that use OWL ontologies to both assist 
> the discovery process and also to pull the services together into a 
> workflow. Such as, the semantically enriched web services being 
> developed for ARTEMIS an international project which provides 
> interoperability of medical information systems.
> 
> The audience will understand how specific knowledge management 
> chal-lenges are addressed including - how using ontologies for 
> managing content ensures a high level of relevance for the knowledge 
> that is being associated with the semantic annotations. Given,  
> documents can be viewed (and there-fore indexed) according to 
> different views of the world, and assigned different classification 
> schemes used for different purposes. Further, why a multidi-mensional 
> view of the world requires use of several ontologies, not as a single 
> classification hierarchy, but as a product of orthogonal hierarchies. 
> Given (1) a large overlap among the subject fields involved and (2)  a

> large number of codes and rubrics, typically in the order of magnitude

> of 10000-100000 entries, in commonly used terminological systems;
> 
> Additionally, participants will learn how the enterprise content 
> management capabilities of ISO/TS 15000 based Registry / Repository 
> are used to met the challenges. For instance, although the ISO/TS 
> 15000 standard does not ex-plicitly reference semantic content 
> capabilities the session will shown how it is already being used to 
> associate web services with OWL ontologies. Specifically, in addition 
> to explaining the approach used by the Artemeis project, the speaker 
> will show how the Mayo Clinic has successfully used the Registry / 
> Repository for their Ontological investigations. Referencing, how the 
> Electronic Health Record (EHR) is defined by two ontological levels. 
> (1) Level One On-tology represents the high-level classes and 
> relationships for the entire longi-tudinal HER (the classes are domain

> independent); (2) Level Two ontology represents clinical concepts in 
> the form of classes and the relationships be-tween those classes; (3) 
> Classes in the Level Two ontology can be repre-sented both through its

> relationships with the classes of the Level One ontol-ogy, and through

> it's relationships with the classes in the Level Two ontology. 
> Finally, the attendees will be given a brief status report outlining 
> the progress of the OASIS EbXML Registry / Repository Semantic Content

> Management SC effort focused on enabling the creation of a repository 
> of ontologies. De-scriptions provided include how such a repository 
> would facilitate ontology discovery and encourage reuse across 
> enterprises. Plus, how the logical con-sistency of ontologies can be 
> checked with a reasoner, and implicit knowledge can be inferred for 
> these ontologies using queries employing semantic terms
> 
> <quote who="Chiusano Joseph">
> > Just a friendly reminder that the deadline for abstracts
> > (non-late-breaking) for XML 2004 is tomorrow, Fri., 5/7/04.
> >
> >> Here are some ideas we been considering recently in various forums:
> >>
> >> -Semantic Content Management Using ebXML Registry (present work of 
> >> the SCM SC, Carl Mattocks, Farrukh, ....) Carl, please confirm if 
> >> you can take ownership of this?
> >>
> >> -Vocabulary Management Using ebXML Registry (present the work of 
> >> the UK egov pilot, Paul Spencer, Farrukh, Duane, ....) Duane, 
> >> please confirm if you can take ownership of this per our 
> >> discussions at Amsterdam?
> >
> 
> --
> Carl Mattocks
> 
> co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC 
> co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC CEO CHECKMi
> v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
> www.CHECKMi.com
> Semantically Smart Compendiums
> (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_work
> group.php.

-- 
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgr
oup.php.