OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] FW: IECM Standards Proposal


Group:

Mike Connor from Adobe has agreed to take on this "synchronization"  
task.

Thanks,
Matt

On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> I would be happy to help sync this activity as Farrukh mentions below -
> having said that, I wonder if our Adobe members (Peter, Duane, Matt)  
> are
> the best folks to do this since Mike Connor of Adobe is helping lead  
> it.
> Thoughts?
>
> The joint xmlCoP/SICoP (Semantic Interop CoP) meeting yesterday that
> Owen refers to was attended by Carl, myself, and Ed Chase. At lunch,  
> Roy
> Morgan of NIST lead an information discussion on registries - i.e. what
> would the user community look for in a federal XML registry (or set of
> federated registries). Carl contributed information regarding SCM, and  
> I
> contributed a brief overview of registry standards - 11179, UDDI, and
> ours - and the similarities/differences between them, as well as the
> types of information that one would register in a registry (all verbal
> contributions).
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:54 PM
>> To: Farrukh Najmi
>> Cc: Chiusano Joseph; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: Re: [regrep] FW: IECM Standards Proposal
>>
>> I talked privately with the principals involved in the
>> initiative ... they are very much aware of the potential
>> ebXMl Registry offers. Indeed, they acknowledged that the
>> presentation produced by Farrukh for Europe XML was very
>> prominent in their thinking. It was also agreed that Content
>> Management included info about legacy systems..
>>
>> I suggest that it is now time for the RegRep TC to explicitly
>> declare our intent of supporting Content Management beyond
>> XML artifacts.
>>
>> carl
>>
>> <quote who="Farrukh Najmi">
>>> ebXML Registry standard should be factored into any Content
>> Management
>>> standards activity. I have always maintained that Content (and
>>> Metadata) Management is our core value. Can you explore what can be
>>> done to sync these activities with Owen and others? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forwarding this message from Owen Ambur, Co-Chair of the XML.gov
>>>> Working Group. It refers to the crafting of "a conceptual
>> proposal for
>>>> specification of an international standard for Interoperable
>>>> Enterprise Content Management (IECM)" within AIIM, an
>> effort lead by
>>>> Paul Fontaine of US Department of Transportation (DOT) and
>> Mike Connor of Adobe.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone else on our TC (besides Duane, Matt, and Ed
>> Chase) aware of
>>>> this effort? Can/should we factor ebXML Registry in?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>> Booz Allen Hamilton
>>>> Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Owen_Ambur@ios.doi.gov [mailto:Owen_Ambur@ios.doi.gov]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:17 PM
>>>> To: Paul.Fontaine@ost.dot.gov; miconnor@adobe.com
>>>> Cc: bfanning@aiim.org; dennis.hamilton@acm.org;
>> jtsprehe@jtsprehe.com;
>>>> sheila.campbell@gsa.gov; Thomas_McClay@ios.doi.gov;
>>>> tbyrne@cmswatch.com; ejw@cse.ucsc.edu; bmanago@mdy.com;
>>>> Jon.Barrett@Tally.Hummingbird.com;
>>>> julian.reschke@gmx.de; gstein@lyra.org; qdaly@xythos.com;
>>>> GOConnell@PureEdge.com; richards.john-a@epamail.epa.gov;
>>>> odonnell.chris@epa.gov; Edwin_McCeney@ios.doi.gov;
>>>> Maewyn.Cumming@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk;
>>>> John.Borras@e-Envoy.gsi.gov.uk; karl.best@oasis-open.org;
>>>> Diane.Lewis@nhtsa.dot.gov; Ted_Weir@blm.gov;
>> Michael.Daconta@dhs.gov;
>>>> Niemann.Brand@epamail.epa.gov; susan.turnbull@gsa.gov;
>> Chiusano Joseph
>>>> Subject: IECM Standards Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul & Mike, thanks a bunch for taking the lead in crafting a
>>>> conceptual proposal for specification of an international
>> standard for
>>>> Interoperable Enterprise Content Management (IECM)!
>>>>
>>>> Such an effort would be a natural extension of AIIM's
>> technical report
>>>> on document and records management functions:  ANSI/AIIM TR48-2004,
>>>> Framework for the Integration of Electronic Document Management
>>>> Systems and Electronic Records Management Systems.
>>>> http://www.aiim.org/standards.asp?ID=24484 (That group, in which I
>>>> participated, made a conscious decision to *exclude*
>> consideration of
>>>> "content" management as a matter of manageable scope.)
>>>>
>>>> It could also build upon and "modernize" the efforts of the
>> Document
>>>> Management Alliance (DMA), including the ODMA standard, taking into
>>>> account the evolution of the Web, XML, and component-based, service
>>>> oriented architecture.  See http://www.infonuovo.com/dma/ &
>>>> http://www.infonuovo.com/odma/ &
>>>> http://nfocentrale.net/NuovoDoc/info/deh-sketch.htm
>>>>
>>>> It could be considered an extension to the WebDAV standard and DASL.
>>>> See http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/authoring/ &
>> http://www.webdav.org/ &
>>>> http://www.webdav.org/dasl/
>>>>
>>>> As you have outlined the problem/opportunity, XForms could also be
>>>> implicated.  http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/  Certainly,
>> "forms" are
>>>> just another kind of document/record/content that needs to
>> be managed.
>>>> For example, the core set of metadata required to manage
>> forms may be
>>>> the same as for any other document/record.
>>>>
>>>> However, as I indicated at the joint xmlCoP/SICoP meeting
>> yesterday, I
>>>> encourage you to scope the effort to encompass work that can be
>>>> reasonably accomplished in a relatively short period of
>> time, e.g., 6
>>>> months.
>>>> Ideally, one result would be to flesh out the
>> document/records/content
>>>> management elements of the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
>>>> Service Component Reference Model (SRM), Data and Information
>>>> Reference Model (DRM), and Technical Reference Model (TRM).  In
>>>> particular, I believe the time is ripe for specification of
>> a core set
>>>> of XML metadata elements to facilitate the discovery and
>> management of
>>>> documents/records/content on the Web.
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line is that I will be *delighted* to support this
>>>> initiative in any way that I can, particularly with respect
>> to the XML
>>>> related aspects.
>>>>
>>>> Owen Ambur, Co-Chair
>>>> xmlCoP  http://xml.gov/
>>>>
>>>> BTW, here is the agenda that was postponed due to the
>> events of 9/11:
>>>> http://xml.gov/agenda/20010919old.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
>> the roster
>>>> of  the OASIS TC), go to
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/
>> leave_workgroup.php.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Farrukh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from
>> the roster
>>> of the OASIS TC), go to
>>>
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le
>> ave_workgroup.php.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>> co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content
>> SC co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC CEO CHECKMi
>> v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com Semantically Smart Compendiums
>> (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster  
> of the OASIS TC), go to  
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/ 
> leave_workgroup.php.
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]