Re: [regrep] ebXML Registry Conformance Specification

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Matthew MacKenzie wrote:

>I don't understand why we need to define conformance for clients.  I think
>we should focus on defining conformance for the registry service provider.
>  
>
Defining conformance levels for clients may not be necessary if there 
are no normative yet optional features for clients in current specs.
I do not know if that is that case of the top of my head. I added it for 
completeness.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh