[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Draft abstract for OASIS Symposium submission - please review!
All, Attached is the draft abstract. Please review and send comments by noon on Monday, as the abstract is due on Monday!! The name of the presenter and bio must be submitted at the time the abstract is submitted. I am willing to be the presenter, unless someone else would like to do so. I (or whoever will be presenting) can probably use some help in identifying the implementations we want to highlight. The presentation materials are not due until April 4th, so there is plenty of time to work on those (assuming the abstract is accepted). Please note - the theme for the Symposium is The Future of XML Vocabularies (see: http://www.oasis-open.org/events/symposium_2005/call_for_participation.p hp) The topic areas are (must select one for the submission process): * Domain and Industry specific vocabularies * Schema extensibility, versioning, reuse, validation * Best Practices now and future (relates to development of domain specific vocabularies) * B2B web services vocabularies and dependencies * Business process rules and policies (in implementation of XML vocabularies) * Semantic reasoning technology (mapping between domain-specific XML vocabularies) * Internationalization and localization for XML Vocabularies... * Other (I believe our presentation would fall under Other, and the topic listed for the presentation might be Implementations and Lessons Learned). An additional guideline related to presentation on spec work is: Proposals related to current specification work, i.e., efforts underway within OASIS TCs or other standards bodies, should emphasize the development, usage, application, deployment, and interoperability aspects, and future considerations, as opposed to merely summarizing the specification work. Should the abstract include something related to using a registry to manage a vocabulary, or registering vocabulary mappings, and do we have any implementation examples of this? Should there be more emphasis in the abstract on the sharing of information between entities and how an ebXML registry enables this? The Audience levels are: * Technical * Implementation * Management I would consider this presentation to be implementation. Does that sound right? Please send comments ASAP so we can complete the submission by the deadline! <<Abstract for OASIS Symposium April 24.doc>> Thanks! Kathryn Kathryn Breininger CENTRAL Project Manager Emerging Technologies Boeing Library Services 425-965-0182 phone 425-237-3491 fax kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com
Abstract for OASIS Symposium April 24.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]