[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS
Why am I getting a 1999 flashback here? :) Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Booz Allen Hamilton Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > -----Original Message----- > From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:50 PM > To: Anders W. Tell > Cc: ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep) > Subject: Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's > and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS > > Anders: > > Sure - XMI probably is the best choice we have for model a > interchange format, but it is a lot larger than a comparable > binary file would be for storing persistent information about > the same model. If you used XMI exclusively, it would take > up a lot more space on your users machines and take a lot > longer to parse, load. > > I think most of the UML tool vendors have it right -> they > use binary files and allow the users the chance to build and > export XMI renditions. > > Duane > > Anders W. Tell wrote: > > > Duane Nickull wrote: > > > >> XMI would be notoriously innefficient as a storage > mechanism for UML > >> projects. > > > > > > Could you elaborate on this ? Most UML tools use XMI based > formats so > > it must be usable. What are your concerns? > > > > /anders > > > > -- > *********** > Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - > http://www.adobe.com > Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ > Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa > *********** > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/le > ave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]