Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Duane,

I would further add that using production rules from UML to generate
CAM templates is also a smart option here.

DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
To: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst@toolsmiths.se>
Cc: "ebXML Regrep (ebXML Regrep)" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry -
UML/UMM Profile for CCTS


> Anders:
>
> Sure - XMI probably is the best choice we have for model a interchange
> format, but it is a lot larger than a comparable binary file would be
> for storing persistent information about the same model.  If you used
> XMI exclusively, it would take up a lot more space on your users
> machines and take a lot longer to parse, load.
>
> I think most of the UML tool vendors have it right -> they use binary
> files and allow the users the chance to build and export XMI renditions.
>
> Duane
>
> Anders W. Tell wrote:
>
> > Duane Nickull wrote:
> >
> >> XMI would be notoriously innefficient as a storage mechanism for UML
> >> projects.
> >
> >
> > Could you elaborate on this ? Most UML tools use XMI based formats so
> > it must be usable. What are your concerns?
> >
> > /anders
> >
>
> -- 
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
> Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC -
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa
> ***********
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>