RE: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding

[Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>]

Monica,

Perhaps you could come on down to earth with us? ;p

The point is, demand is a good indicator of perception, and I think I am
qualified to speak on demand.

-matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:58 AM
To: Matthew MacKenzie; 'Farrukh Najmi'
Cc: 'Chiusano Joseph'; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] Proposed changes to ebMS Binding and HTTP Binding


>MacKenzie: I don't know that it matters.  The two major implementations
have not really
>supported the ebMS binding, and there have not been many complaints that I
>can remember.
>  
>
mm1: Perhaps we should separate the two major implementations from the 
question Joe is asking, which is an integratable ebXML framework. Thanks.

>Chiusano: Does removing the ebMS binding "break" anyone's perception
(within or outside
>of OASIS) of an integratable ebXML framework? 
>