Re: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry - UML/UMM Profile for CCTS

["David Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Mark,

We are pretty busy - but I am trying to save people some time
as well ; -)

I do have a schema model and rules that output to a CAM template
and XML structure that would be instructive for people to review.

Since I also have some UML symbols - I could possibly adapt
that to work that way too.  The principle is the important
thing here - use symbols - design information model - hit "generate"
button -
output XSD, XML structure, and CAM template with business rules that is
conformant are ready to run.  Well almost - you would want to output
the context instance too...

I'll see what break I get in the "busy" schedule to look at this.

Cheers, DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>
To: <david@drrw.info>; <anderst@toolsmiths.se>;
<regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc: <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: [regrep] Final draft recommendations for CC's and Registry -
UML/UMM Profile for CCTS


David

>
> What is the end objective for the "UML to XML" within CEFACT ATG?

How we are going to generate XML schema for CEFACT from UML models.

> Obviously one side of this is potentially production rules
> within UML that can output schema and templates such as CAM -
> that carry the interchange rules.

Right - but consistent with a set of schema NDRs.  We want the schema to
look the same - regardless of the source.


> Obviously if such XML is of the transaction exchange nature -
> then CEFACT ATG can shorten their development cycles by
> potentially leveraging and extending the work that have
> already been done with CAM.

I thought CAM was too busy solving world hunger :-)