Re: [regrep] Standards approval process

["David Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Farrukh,

I concur with that.   In our recent work we're finding at least
one other way to approach this CCTS / RegRep- and I'm
sure other people will modify and adapt this significantly
as they get into really loading vocabularies into
registry - and more - and finding the speed bumps and
comptability issues, etc.  Just for starters - going in an
out of Excel spreadsheet to XML and RegRep is
one challenge - given the design teams are currently
using Excel as their front door.

I'd suggest this as a informative notes report - would work
well at this point.  I'm not sure any of know what the real
answers are - but its clear we will be working much on
this is 2005 - including all the CEFACT project work -
and they also may have yet another valid approach too
(I see at least two other team there working this stuff).

At the end of the day - this probably devolves down to
a core set of interoperable behaviours around a common
set of components in two or three different XML layouts
and technqiues - depending on what the problem domain
is and the audience and their preferred toolsets.

We certainly do not want to paint ourselves into a corner
too early here.

Thanks, DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
To: "Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>
Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process


> Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>
> >Below is the OASIS standards approval process.  I felt everyone should
> >be familiar with this process as we continue reviewing the RIM and RS v.
> >3.0 specs with the intent to move them forward through the OASIS
> >Standards process.
> >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standards_approval
> >
> >
> I am embarrased to say that I opened this document only now before my
> planned YES vote.
>
> I noticed that it uses the term "best practices paper" to refer to the
> paper. I think this would be
> sending a confusing message. At the risk of being a PITA may I suggest a
> quick update that
> replaces "best practices pare" with "report" and we then vote to approve
> that version?
>
> Sorry to have to bother Duane with a request for another update.
>
> If other team members think it is OK as is then I will go along. Thoughts?
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>