[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process
Ivan: There was a requirements document done first that explains the utility of this work. It is approved by the RR team and posted on the website. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/regrep-cc-review/ There was also a workplan developed and approved. The fact is that this work no longer belongs in this TC IMO. We need to give what we have, complete or not, to UN/CEFACT so they can complete the work on CCTS, Context framework, etc as well as others like CAM, UDEF etc who are facing similar issues. Duane Nickull BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote: >Hi, >before to vote for this document I'd like to better understand his real >utility. >Actually we are working on UN/Cefact Registry specifications proposition >and we don't think that we will use the serialization proposed in this >document for several reasons. >For example it doesn't seem to be CCTS compliant and doesn't give us a >solution or a proposition on how we have to map the ccts components to >ebRIM. > >the more recent experiences on CCTS and RR give us some better different >solutions, and so is it possible to update the document before to vote >for that ? > >best regards, >ivan > > > > >Le samedi 15 janvier 2005 à 10:56 -0500, David Webber (XML) a écrit : > > >>Farrukh, >> >>I concur with that. In our recent work we're finding at least >>one other way to approach this CCTS / RegRep- and I'm >>sure other people will modify and adapt this significantly >>as they get into really loading vocabularies into >>registry - and more - and finding the speed bumps and >>comptability issues, etc. Just for starters - going in an >>out of Excel spreadsheet to XML and RegRep is >>one challenge - given the design teams are currently >>using Excel as their front door. >> >>I'd suggest this as a informative notes report - would work >>well at this point. I'm not sure any of know what the real >>answers are - but its clear we will be working much on >>this is 2005 - including all the CEFACT project work - >>and they also may have yet another valid approach too >>(I see at least two other team there working this stuff). >> >>At the end of the day - this probably devolves down to >>a core set of interoperable behaviours around a common >>set of components in two or three different XML layouts >>and technqiues - depending on what the problem domain >>is and the audience and their preferred toolsets. >> >>We certainly do not want to paint ourselves into a corner >>too early here. >> >>Thanks, DW >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> >>To: "Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com> >>Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org> >>Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:42 PM >>Subject: Re: [regrep] Standards approval process >> >> >> >> >>>Breininger, Kathryn R wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Below is the OASIS standards approval process. I felt everyone should >>>>be familiar with this process as we continue reviewing the RIM and RS v. >>>>3.0 specs with the intent to move them forward through the OASIS >>>>Standards process. >>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standards_approval >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I am embarrased to say that I opened this document only now before my >>>planned YES vote. >>> >>>I noticed that it uses the term "best practices paper" to refer to the >>>paper. I think this would be >>>sending a confusing message. At the risk of being a PITA may I suggest a >>>quick update that >>>replaces "best practices pare" with "report" and we then vote to approve >>>that version? >>> >>>Sorry to have to bother Duane with a request for another update. >>> >>>If other team members think it is OK as is then I will go along. Thoughts? >>> >>>-- >>>Regards, >>>Farrukh >>> >>> >>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >>> >>> >>the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >> >> > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > -- *********** Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/ Chair - OASIS eb SOA TC - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ebsoa ***********
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]