[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: was Reg/Rep 1/20/2005: Comments on ebRS v3.0 Draft
Monica J. Martin wrote: > [general] Should we consider breaking out the SAML profile similar to > how WS-Security OASIS has approached the use of token profiles? One > editorial motivator for asking this is the document is getting very > long. Some of the specialized, advanced functions could be held in > separate documents/appendices/etc. +1. I also prefer the Divide Et Impera approach. I'd already suggested to Farrukh to consider moving RIM chapter 9 (Access Control Information Model) out from RIM document. Besides the title (..Information Model) that chapter is long and has little in common with the other chapters in that document from the perspective that it does not define new RIM classes. Of course the tradeoffs must be considered, i.e., there'd be one more document to maintain - but i still think it is easier to maintain small parts than a big junk. Diego -- Diego Ballve Digital Artefacts Europe http://www.digital-artefacts.fi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]