[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] [Draft] Statement of relationship with other standards
Since we mention SOAP profiles, should we say anything
about WS-I??
pk From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 8:22 AM To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [regrep] [Draft] Statement of relationship with other standards Dear colleagues, Here is the revised (shortened) text based onKathryn's latest suggestions for
your convenience. Please comment on this revised version that
follows... As Kathryn mentioned, in order to submit our specs for OASIS standardization
process next week we need Please share comments on this thread. Thanks. <draft text> [3.] A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to The OASIS ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications are aligned with a variety of other OASIS standards as described below. similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations.
Both specifications define a registry that is a web service. Both specifications define a registry that may be used as a registry for web services. The two specifications have been independently developed and neither specifications uses the other as a dependency. Limited similarities exist between the OASIS ebXML Registry 3.0 and OASIS UDDI 3.0. Both specifications define a registry for web services and a registry exposed as a web service. UDDI 3.0 specifies a registry only, while ebXML Registry 3.0 specifies both a registry and a repository. No explicit dependencies exist between the two OASIS specification efforts. -- Regards, Farrukh--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: regrep-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: regrep-help@lists.oasis-open.org |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]