OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep]draft of ballot to come


Peter Kacandes wrote:

>What?!
>
>Why are we submitting anything about UDDI?
>
>Did somebody not cut and paste correctly?
>
>Better do a better job of proof-reading first.
>  
>
I think Jamie had his dates mixed up and thought it was April 1 ;-)
He was surely pulling a joke on us ;-)

>pk 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
>Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 3:51 AM
>To: James Bryce Clark; regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [regrep] [Before Sending Out Ballot - Please Note!] RE: [regrep]
>draft of ballot to come
>
>Jamie,
>
>Wanted to call your attention to this prior to sending OASIS-wide - Please
>note the unintentionally embedded additional text in the paragraph below:
>
><Quote>
>The OASIS ebXML Registry TC has submitted the ebXML Registry Information
>Model (RIM) v3.0 and ebMXL Registy sndUniversal Description, Discovery &
>Integration (UDDI) specification v3.0.2, an approved Committee Draft, to be
>considered as an OASIS Standard. The TC's submission is attached below.
></Quote>
>
>Joe
>
>Joseph Chiusano
>Booz Allen Hamilton
>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> 
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:06 PM
>>To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: [regrep] draft of ballot to come
>>
>>
>>     FYI, here's what I plan to post tomorrow afternoon to formally 
>>launch the OASIS Standard vote.  Best regards JBC
>>
>>====
>>DRAFT (for posting 1 April)
>>
>>Subject: ebXML Registry specifications submitted for OASIS Standard
>>From: James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
>>To: tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org,members@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Date: [1 April]
>>
>>OASIS members:
>>
>>The OASIS ebXML Registry TC has submitted the ebXML Registry 
>>Information Model (RIM) v3.0 and ebMXL Registy sndUniversal 
>>Description, Discovery & Integration (UDDI) specification v3.0.2, an 
>>approved Committee Draft, to be considered as an OASIS Standard. The 
>>TC's submission is attached below.
>>
>>In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, the 
>>specification has already gone through a 30 day public review period.
>>(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200502/msg00
>>008.html)
>>OASIS members now have until the 15th of April to familiarize 
>>themselves with the submission below. OASIS members should give their 
>>input on this question to the voting representative of their 
>>organization.
>>
>>By the 16th of the month we will send out a Call For Vote to the 
>>voting representatives of the OASIS member organizations, who will 
>>have until the end of the month to cast their ballots on whether this 
>>Committee Draft should be approved as an OASIS Standard.
>>
>>The normative TC Process for approval of Committee Drafts as OASIS 
>>Standards is found at 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standard
>>
>>Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at 
>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/ipr.php
>>
>>~ James Bryce Clark
>>~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS ~ +1 978 667 5115 x
>>203 central offiice
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Submission for OASIS Membership Vote:
>>>
>>>1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its
>>>      
>>>
>>type, together
>>    
>>
>>>with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of which 
>>>must be written using approved OASIS templates.
>>>    A zip file with both specifications and related files
>>>      
>>>
>>is publicly
>>    
>>
>>>available from
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=12049
>>>
>>>The zip file contains:
>>>1. The OASIS ebXML Registry Information Model (RIM)
>>>      
>>>
>>specification, v3.0
>>    
>>
>>>as "regrep-rim-3.0-cs-02.pdf".
>>>2. The OASIS ebXML Registry Services (RS) specification, v3.0 as 
>>>"regrep-rs-3.0-cs-02.pdf".
>>>3. Supporting files and documentation including:
>>>    a. 10 WSDL description files
>>>    b. 21 XML scheme files
>>>    c. 5 XSD files
>>>
>>>The individual approved Committee Draft specifications in PDF format 
>>>(same as in zip files) are publicly available from the ebXML
>>>      
>>>
>>Registry TC site.
>>    
>>
>>>OASIS ebXML Registry Services and Protocols version 3.0
>>>      
>>>
>>Committee Draft:
>>    
>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12060/regre
>>>      
>>>
>>p-rs-3.0-c
>>    
>>
>>>d-02.pdf
>>>
>>>OASIS ebXML Registry Information Model version 3.0 Committee Draft:
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12061/regre
>>>      
>>>
>>p-rim-3.0-
>>    
>>
>>>cd-02.pdf
>>>
>>>2. A clear English-language summary of the specification:
>>>
>>>The ebXML Registry provides a stable store where submitted
>>>      
>>>
>>content and
>>    
>>
>>>the metadata used to describe that content is managed and is
>>>      
>>>
>>made persistent.
>>    
>>
>>>Such information is used to facilitate business to business 
>>>relationships and transactions. In the business to business context, 
>>>submitted content includes but is not limited to XML schema and 
>>>documents, process descriptions, ebXML Core Components, context 
>>>descriptions, UML models, information about organizations,
>>>      
>>>
>>and software
>>    
>>
>>>components. An ebXML Registry is capable of storing any type of 
>>>electronic content including XML documents, text, images, or sound.
>>>Metadata is used to describe the stored content and is
>>>      
>>>
>>defined in the
>>    
>>
>>>Registry Information Model (RIM). Submitted content may be stored in 
>>>the content repository provided by the ebXML Registry. The
>>>      
>>>
>>interface to
>>    
>>
>>>the Registry is defined in the Registry Services and
>>>      
>>>
>>Protocols (RS) document.
>>    
>>
>>>It provides a set of services that enable sharing of content and 
>>>metadata between organizations.  The RS defines the services
>>>      
>>>
>>provided
>>    
>>
>>>by an ebXML Registry and the protocols used by clients to
>>>      
>>>
>>interact with these services.
>>    
>>
>>>The version 2.0 RIM and RS specifications were approved as OASIS 
>>>Standards in May 2002, and ISO approved them as ISO 15000 part 3 and 
>>>part 4 standards in March 2004. Version 3.0 of RIM and RS add 
>>>considerable functionality over version 2.0.  New functionality 
>>>available in version 3.0 include registry federation and federated 
>>>queries, which enable clients to discover information stored
>>>      
>>>
>>in any of
>>    
>>
>>>multiple federated registries through one search. To meet
>>>      
>>>
>>the needs for
>>    
>>
>>>security in a federated environment, version 3.0 utilizes the OASIS 
>>>SAML 2.0 specifications for identity management, authentication and 
>>>single sign on across the members. The OASIS XACML 1.0 standard is 
>>>leveraged to provide access control policies and OASIS WSS
>>>      
>>>
>>SOAP Message
>>    
>>
>>>Security 1.0 is used to secure the registry's SOAP protocol
>>>      
>>>
>>using digital certificates.
>>    
>>
>>>Extensible service interfaces and protocols are defined in
>>>      
>>>
>>version 3.0
>>    
>>
>>>as plugins to an ebXML Registry that provide content cataloging 
>>>services and content validation services.  The version 3.0 also 
>>>provides managed version control through the registry.  A new HTTP 
>>>binding to the ebXML Registry Services interfaces is defined
>>>      
>>>
>>using a REST style architecture.
>>    
>>
>>>This enables any content or meta data in the registry to be
>>>      
>>>
>>accessible
>>    
>>
>>>over an HTTP URL using a standard web browser.  A
>>>      
>>>
>>Parameterized Stored
>>    
>>
>>>Query feature allows a complex query to be stored in the registry in 
>>>parameterized form. To invoke the query, the client provides some or 
>>>all of the query parameters, usually using a web form to fill in the 
>>>parameters and submit the query. Other query improvements include 
>>>iterative queries, content based queries, and improved
>>>      
>>>
>>filter query syntax.
>>    
>>
>>>In version 3.0 subscriptions may be created by the user for 
>>>content-based event notification of specific events of interest.
>>>Notification is sent to a web service or an email address.  
>>>      
>>>
>>Additional
>>    
>>
>>>new features include extensibility of registry protocol for defining 
>>>new types of requests and responses, incorporation of user defined 
>>>domain specific taxonomies, and the ability to group related content 
>>>artifacts in packages.
>>>
>>>3. a statement regarding the relationship of this specification to 
>>>similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards
>>>      
>>>
>>developing organizations:
>>    
>>
>>>     The OASIS ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications are
>>>      
>>>
>>aligned with a
>>    
>>
>>>variety of OASIS and other standards as described below.
>>>*       The OASIS Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.0 
>>>specification is used to provide Message Security for the
>>>      
>>>
>>Registry protocol.
>>    
>>
>>>*       The OASIS Web Services Security: SOAP Message with 
>>>      
>>>
>>Attachments
>>    
>>
>>>(SwA) Profile 1.0 specification is used to provide Message
>>>      
>>>
>>Security for
>>    
>>
>>>SOAP attachments within the Registry protocol.
>>>*       The OASIS XACML 1.0 specification is used to define 
>>>      
>>>
>>the syntax for
>>    
>>
>>>registry Access Control Policies.
>>>*       The OASIS SAML 2.0 specifications are used to 
>>>      
>>>
>>support Federated
>>    
>>
>>>Identity Management and Single Sign On within the registry.
>>>*       The registry conforms to the WS-I: Basic Profile 1.1 
>>>      
>>>
>>for SOAP and
>>    
>>
>>>WSDL conformance.
>>>*       The registry conforms to the WS-I: Attachments 
>>>      
>>>
>>Profile 1.0 for
>>    
>>
>>>SOAP with Attachments conformance.
>>>Limited similarities exist between the OASIS ebXML Registry 3.0 and 
>>>OASIS UDDI 3.0. Both specifications define a registry for
>>>      
>>>
>>web services
>>    
>>
>>>and a registry exposed as a web service. UDDI 3.0 specifies
>>>      
>>>
>>a registry
>>    
>>
>>>only, while ebXML Registry 3.0 specifies both a registry and a 
>>>repository. No explicit dependencies exist between those two
>>>      
>>>
>>OASIS specification efforts.
>>    
>>
>>>4. Certification by at least three OASIS member
>>>      
>>>
>>organizations that they
>>    
>>
>>>are successfully using the specifications consistently with
>>>      
>>>
>>the OASIS
>>    
>>
>>>IPR
>>>Policy:
>>>    a. ebXMLsoft Inc. has been successfully using the ebXML
>>>      
>>>
>>Registry
>>    
>>
>>>3.0  specifications consistently with the OASIS IPR Policy. 
>>>      
>>>
>>ebXMLsoft
>>    
>>
>>>considers the ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications an important 
>>>continuation  to delivering functionality necessary to further 
>>>accommodate its ebXML  Federated Enterprise Reference Architecture 
>>>(eFERA).  See
>>>      
>>>
>>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00056.html
>>    
>>
>>>    b. Sun Microsystems Inc. has been successfully using the ebXML 
>>>Registry 3.0 specifications as approved by the OASIS ebXML Registry 
>>>Technical Committee. Sun Microsystems Inc. considers that the ebXML 
>>>Registry 3.0 specifications are ready to be submitted and
>>>      
>>>
>>accepted as
>>    
>>
>>>an  OASIS Standard in accordance with the OASIS IPR Policy. See 
>>>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00054.html
>>>    c. Adobe Systems Incorporated has been successfully using the 
>>>ebXML  Registry 3.0 specifications as approved by the OASIS ebXML 
>>>Registry  Technical Committee. See 
>>>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200502/msg00059.html.
>>>
>>>5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during
>>>      
>>>
>>the public
>>    
>>
>>>review period, along with its resolution:
>>>    Available from
>>>
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11865/regre
>>>      
>>>
>>p-3.0-comm
>>    
>>
>>>ents.html
>>>
>>>6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the
>>>      
>>>
>>specification
>>    
>>
>>>as a Committee Draft:
>>>    Vote to affirm approval of the specifications as
>>>      
>>>
>>Committee Drafts
>>    
>>
>>>documented in the meeting minutes for March 15, 2005:
>>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/minutes/minutes-0
>>>      
>>>
>>3-15-05.pd
>>    
>>
>>>f
>>>
>>>7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any 
>>>earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same
>>>      
>>>
>>specification,
>>    
>>
>>>together with the originating TC's response to each comment:
>>>    These specifications have not previously been submitted
>>>      
>>>
>>to OASIS
>>    
>>
>>>for  approval as standards.
>>>
>>>8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for
>>>      
>>>
>>the originating TC:
>>    
>>
>>>    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep-comment/
>>>
>>>9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all
>>>      
>>>
>>members of
>>    
>>
>>>the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR Policy:
>>>    I have provided all ebXML Registry TC members with the
>>>      
>>>
>>link to the
>>    
>>
>>>OASIS IPR Policy.  See
>>>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200503/msg00018.html
>>>
>>>10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted
>>>      
>>>
>>by one or
>>    
>>
>>>more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee 
>>>Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports exist.
>>>    There are no minority reports submitted by any TC
>>>      
>>>
>>members related
>>    
>>
>>>to  the ebXML Registry specs.  Both the ebXML RS and the ebXML RIM 
>>>specifications were approved as Committee Drafts unanimously.
>>>
>>>Kathryn Breininger
>>>OASIS ebXML Registry TC Chair
>>>      
>>>
>>DRAFT ENDS
>>
>>Note, I deleted several additional "use certifications" from parties 
>>who are not organizational members of OASIS and thus, while welcome as 
>>implementers, do not count towards the rule's minimum quota.
>>
>>Regards JBC
>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
>>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
>>OASIS
>>at:
>>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
>>oups.php
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>  
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]