Re: [regrep] Lightning round ppt question

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Diego Ballve wrote:

>Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>  
>
>>Diego Ballve wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>The graphic in the ppt may not be representing the whole picture as well
>>>>as it should.  The references to services in the diagram may imply to
>>>>folks that the registry is only for registering services, missing the
>>>>rich capability to register any type of asset, including services.
>>>>Perhaps we should use a higher level graphic?  Would it be better to use
>>>>Figure 1 from the RS, which shows a simplified view of ebXML Registry
>>>>architecture?
>>>>  
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>I don't think so. We already describe the parts (as features) in slide
>>>4. Given the limited number of slides, I find a picture telling "what is
>>>it for" more appealing than "how is it organized". I think if the
>>>audience gets interested in the business value of regrep they will
>>>search and find more about the architecture.
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>+1
>>
>>The registry does the following 3 core things for any type of artifact:
>>
>>-Publish
>>
>>-Governance / Management
>>
>>-Discovery
>>
>>Here are some end user use cases that we should try and capture in the
>>picture:
>>
>>-Web Service Artifcats (WSDL, XML Schema) Publish, Governance and Discovery
>>
>>-ebXML Core Components Publish, Governance and Discovery
>>
>>-WSRP Artifacts (Portlet and Producer Services Descriptions) Publish,
>>Governance and Discovery
>>
>>-Publish, Governance and Discovery of eForms and their data
>>
>>-Operational data store for web services (run time usage by a web
>>service to store/discover its application specific content)
>>
>>Now if the picture could show the above artifacts in the registry and
>>arrows from those artifacts to a box showing the use case that would be
>>good.
>>For example, one could show a Core Component Assembly tool as a box and
>>show it connected to a CC box inside registry. Hope this gets the idea
>>across. Diego, is this what you had in mind?
>>    
>>
Another very important example to add is a Schema Assembly tool (similar 
to CC Assembly tool but connect to XML Schema artifacts).
Boy Diego. Your company sure picked a great name ;-)

>
>Cool, that goes even further than what I thought :)
>Monica also has a good picture to show where the registry fits in the
>(ebXML) big picture. We could extend that by marking the "registrable"
>boxes and even add the missing things from your list, like WSRP and eForms.
>
>Diego
>
>  
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh