FW: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

["Miko Matsumura" <mmatsumura@infravio.com>]

Interesting declaration on the future of UDDI/ebXML RegRep coexistence solutions from UDDI TC Chair Luc Clement on the UDDI Dev board...

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@systinet.com] 
	Sent: Thu 6/23/2005 3:37 AM 
	To: 'Governor James'; 'Jørgen Thyme'; uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons
	
	

	"likely to follow" is entirely speculative on your part. Let me be equally speculative: "no others will".  

	 

	________________________________

		From: Governor James [mailto:jgovernor@redmonk.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:03
	To: Jørgen Thyme; uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
	Subject: RE: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

	 

	Sun already supports a dual registry strategy, as does infravio. Others are likely to follow, WS-I fud notwithstanding.

	 

	Coexistence is surely the best approach.

	 

	 

	 

	 

	 

	________________________________

		From: Jørgen Thyme [mailto:jt@globeteam.com] 
	Sent: 22 June 2005 13:54
	To: uddi-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
	Subject: [uddi-dev] ebXML registry and UDDI comparisons

	 

	I have looked at the specs for v3 for the ebXML registry. Although the information model looks more detailed than in UDDI my immediate thinking was that adding my taxonomies in UDDI I can achieve a lot. And there are several implementations of UDDI.

	 

	What are your thoughts? Will vendors of UDDI registries add ebXML registry functionality to their existing products? Or will there be a complete new set of registry products coming?

	 

	 

	Best regards / Med venlig hilsen

	 

	Jørgen Thyme

	 

	Development Team
	Globeteam A/S
	Gentoftegade 118-120
	DK-2820 Gentofte

	
	Tlf.: +45 70 26 29 70
	Fax.: +45 70 26 29 80

	Mobil: +45 40 90 41 67

	jt@globeteam.com