Re: [regrep] [Action] Please comment on proposed outline for regreppresentation to OGC

["Farrukh S. Najmi" <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>]

Farrukh S. Najmi wrote:
> Farrukh S. Najmi wrote:
>   
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> Here is a proposed outline for our presentation to the OGC.
>>
>>     * Overview
>>     * Applications
>>     * Deployments
>>     * Implementations
>>     * Key benefits
>>     * Future directions
>>     * Summary
>>     * Discussion
>>           o Understand why ebRS does not meet OGC needs currently
>>   
>>     
>
> Add to Discussion:
>
> * Discuss OGC issues with ebXML Registry specs
> * Understand areas where OGC feel ebXML Registry specs are more complex
> than they need to be
>   

Add to Discussion:

Get input from OGC for regrep TC on how regrep 4.0 can better support
Location in RIM.
Specifically, should we be considering making any enhancements to core RIM
to support location metadata.

> Thanks.
>   
>> The last point is one that I am particularly interested in learning about.
>> I also want to make sure that OGC is aware that:
>>
>>     * The ebRS protocol is extensible and in fact could support OGC
>>       specific extensions to the core protocol
>>     * Most of the key benefits of regrep are actually provided by ebRS
>>       and not ebRIM
>>
>> Please share your comments and suggestions on the proposed outline
>> before I put together the slides (you too Ron).
>> Thanks.
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com