RE: [regrep] ACTION ITEM

Check with Monica on the procedure. We just went thru this all with BPSS 2.0.4 - and we did end up putting in errata - and then having to have another committee vote on the errata. I believe that is a 15 day delay - depending where you are in the process...? Monica can give more exact guidance.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [regrep] ACTION ITEM
From: "Farrukh S. Najmi" <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>
Date: Tue, December 19, 2006 5:06 pm
To: "Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>
Cc: ebXML Regrep <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>

Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
> I haven't been able to talk with Jamie yet. I wasn't clear what the
> consensus was on this at the conclusion of our last telecon, since it
> sounded like there were several places that needed to be changed if we
> included that one. I may not be remembering correctly....
>

I think you are right. I think we decided that change would not be
allowed as a errata item.

...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:40 PM
>
...
> 2. Any word on what we do about the small change in rim.xsd with the
> missing type attribute? Will we deal with it as errata and update the
> published rim.xsd?
>
>

--
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

regrep message