Re: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1 Errata(PublicComment)

["Farrukh S. Najmi" <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>]

BEDINI Ivan RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:
>  
> <farrukh>
> ==========================================
> Proposed Fixed Text Based upon public comment:
>
> A Submitter MUST supply the id attribute for submitted objects. If the
> id is not a specified then the registry MUST return an
> InvalidRequestException.
>
> If the id and lid match the id and lid of an existing RegistryObject
> within the home registry, then the registry MUST treat it as an Update
> action upon the existing RegistryObject. If the id matches the id of an
> an existing RegistryObject within the home registry but the lid does not
> match that existing object's lid, then the registry MUST return an
> InvalidRequestException.
>
> If the Submitter supplies the id and it is a valid URN then the registry
> MUST honor the Submitter-supplied id value and use it as the value of
> the id attribute of the object in the registry. If the id is not a valid
> URN then the registry MUST treat it as a temporary id and replace it,
> and all references to it within the request, with a registry generated
> universally unique id. A registry generated universally unique id value
> MUST conform to the format of a URN that specifies a DCE 128 bit UUID as
> specified in [UUID]: / (e.g. urn:uuid:a2345678-1234-1234-123456789012).
>
> ==========================================
> </farrukh>
>
> Does it imply that if only the LID matches with an already existing
> RegistryObject then the registry MUST treat it as a Create new RO action
> with the same LID?
>
>   
Hi Ivan,

If it matches an existing lid but has a different id then it is a new
version for the same logical object. This is covered by versioning 
feature's spec. Do we need to make any changes?

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com