Re: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section 3.1Errata(PublicComment)

["Farrukh S. Najmi" <farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>]

Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
> Since we have determined this is a copy/paste correction, shall I add it
> at the end of the RS Errata document, rather than create a 3rd errata
> document? (not sure how to handle, since it is a file, not a
> document...)  Thoughts? 
>   

Excellent idea. That should be adequate IMHO. Thanks.

>
>
> Kathryn Breininger
> Boeing Library Services
> 425-965-0182 phone
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:59 PM
> To: Farrukh S. Najmi
> Cc: Breininger, Kathryn R; ebXML Regrep
> Subject: Re: [regrep] regrep 1/24/2007: Question on RS Section
> 3.1Errata(PublicComment)
>
> Farrukh S. Najmi wrote:
>
>   
>> Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>>  
>>
>>     
>>> It seems we discussed this before Christmas, and that there was some 
>>> issue with changing a wsdl... Maybe I am thinking of something else...
>>>  
>>>    
>>>
>>>       
>> I cannot recall for sure but you may be right. Do you think we should 
>> ask OASIS about rules fixing an obvious copy/paste error like this. I 
>> mean how can a Request message return a response that is a Request 
>> message of same type? Not likely hardly ever - right?
>>  
>>
>>     
> mm1: As noted previously, the TC decides whether the change is
> substantive or editorial. Thanks. :>)
>
>   


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com