Re: [regrep] RIM and RS erratas and files with change marking

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:

>The RIM and RS erratas have been uploaded to Kavi and submitted to OASIS
>for public review. URLs were corrected per Mary. [1]
>
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/23618/regrep-rs-3.0-er
>rata-1.0-prd01.doc
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/23617/regrep-rim-3%200
>-errata-prd01.doc
>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/22562/regrep-3.0.1-cd3
>.zip
>
Kathryn, As we go through this process of Public Review. I have a Errata 
type question. If this is a non-substantive document, why would you have 
normative references? I don't see this addressed in the TC process. [2]  
Will continue to look over. Thanks.

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200704/msg00027.html
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php