[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 1 Standard multiple parts
A quick update... I have started creating the changes for 1 Standard multiple parts decision from our last meeting. Looking at the Open Office example (thanks Robin): http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/csd07/ Originally I thought we would have 2 parts (ebRIM, ebRS) plus the mastre document. I feel we need more than two parts as follows:
Also note the URLs behind the part links above. They are consistent with OpenOffice and also consistent with our specification bundle structure. Are we all good with above multi-parts? Please respond right away to reduce downstream rework as I am actively working full-speed ahead on the specs. Thanks. On 03/03/2011 12:51 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: 4D6FD517.5060900@wellfleetsoftware.com" type="cite">...F410F57DEDDC0049ADEB2886CC15060B0166F6B7E8@XCH-NW-03V.nw.nos.boeing.com" type="cite">3. Discussion for v4.0 One multipart standard, or multiple standards. 4D6FD517.5060900@wellfleetsoftware.com" type="cite"> -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]