OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] Re: Comments on ISO 19763 Parts 7, 5, 8



That sounds closer to (a) rather than (b) unless I am mistaken.

Jamie, can you please comment.

Thanks Denise.

On 10/26/2011 11:25 AM, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) [E] wrote:
We are talking about a.  Between JTC1 SC32 WG2 and OASIS and probably the TC you mention would be best.  Its the review of the process, service, role/goal models that we are thinking of ... There will also be a metamodel for registration of information models and one for registration of forms in the next year or so as well...


On 10/26/11 10:51 AM, "Farrukh Najmi"<farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>  wrote


One point needs clarification.

Are we talking about liaison between:

a) OASIS ebXML RegRep TC and  JTC1 SC32 WG2, working group for Metadata, or

b) OASIS and ISO

I think for (b) we already have someone at OASIS end (probably Jamie
Clarke).

For (a) it probably should be a member of the RegRep TC (short list).


On 10/26/2011 10:41 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Hi Denise,

Farrukh, thanks for forwarding Denise's query. I see that Jamie Clark
is copied on this. He is the right person to answer this as he handles
our liaison policies and relationships.

Best,

/chet

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Farrukh Najmi
<farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>   wrote:
Hi Denise,

Thank you for the update. I defer to my OASIS colleagues on your questions
regarding liaison model as they have more experience in this.

Personally, I think either model could work. The single liaison has the
advantage that the buck stops there but then you also have a single point of
failure. The distributed model scales better and is more fault-tolerant.

Have a very productive meeting and safe travels.

On 10/25/2011 04:22 PM, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) [E] wrote:
Hi Farrukh,

I am attending the SC32 WG2 Interim meeting now and everyone was very
happy  and it was well received to have your input from US Oasis. The
question came up about whether there is a way to get OASIS input  on a broad
international basis?  I think maybe an International liaison from OASIS to
SC32  - vs each National Body asking their country OASIS representatives to
help review the 19763 drafts.

Do you have any suggestions along these lines?


On 9/12/11 5:07 PM, "Farrukh Najmi"<farrukh@wellfleetsoftware.com>     wrote:



Hi Denise,

Attached are the list of issues I have compiled on behalf of the OASIS
ebXML RegRep TC as requested by you on behalf of JTC1 SC32 WG2, working
group for Metadata.

Attached are the 3 comment documents with the formal comments being
submitted as well as 3 source documents with comments and edits inline
for context in case you need it. Note that one of then is in .odt format
due to some editor limitations I had.

Please let me know if you need any clarification on these comments.
Thank you.



--
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]