[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Name classes
> > In particular, I believe it is necessary to support ... Thanks for your clarification. It is not different from my expectation. One question: do you think that choice of positive literals (e.g., <choice><name>a</name><name>b</name></choice>) are necessary? Or are they allowed only for the following reason? > I found that any solution that didn't use a nested structure with a set of > primitives and a set of operations to combine them became messy fast. My algorithm for detecting duplication of attribute name requires backtracking only because of choice of positive literals. Do other algorithms become simpler if choice of positive literals is disallosed? Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC