Re: Deciding on the name

[cagle@olywa.net (Kurt Cagle)]

The ++ notation also tends to imply that the next gen RELAX is more OOP than
previous gen RELAX, raises the issue of what happens when we get to RELAX
3.0 (assuming the version being discussed now is analogous to a 2.0), and
has fallen out of favor in the marketing side of things.

-- Kurt Cagle
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Clark" <jjc@jclark.com>
To: "TREX Discussion List" <trex@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Deciding on the name


> I really don't like the name RELAX++. One reason is that you can't have +
> signs in a domain name.  So we can't have a domain relax++.org; it would
> have to be relaxplusplus.org.  Another reason is that calling it RELAX++
to
> me suggests a much greater level of compabitility between RELAX and
RELAX++
> (as for example between C and C++).than is likely to be the case.
>
> James
>
>
>