[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: precious little press
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > / Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net> was heard to say: > | I must say I am surprised that the unification of Relax and Trex has not > | gotten much press, not even on XMLHack. I can't come up with another XML > | initiative that is more important in the /schema/ of things, especially as a > | foil or alternative to XML Schema. Are editors getting late-night, > | anonymous, threatening phone calls to quash the news? %^} Or perhaps we need > | to do a bit more arm waving. > > I've been slightly surprised too. I think perhaps the official choice > of a new name might be an appropriate occasion on which the editors > could send another announcement to xml-dev. If we do xml-dev announcement, maybe it'd also help to include some specific language like: If you're an author or editor currently working on an XML-related book or article, especially if it includes discussion XML schema languages, contact the TREX technical committee <trex-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> for up-to-date information and clarification of * details on the TREX/RELAX unification * the relationship of the unified TREX/RELAX XML schema language to the W3C XML schema offering * plans for making the unified TREX/RELAX XML schema language an international standard * existing and planned tools/implementations And I guess we ought to be pestering anybody we know personally who's got an XML-related book in the works to try to include a reference to TREX/RELAX (RELAX NG, if that's what's been decided)-- if it's appropriate for the particular book, of course.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC