Re: combine proposal

[MURATA Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>]

>Maybe there's an easy solution to this.  Observe that in all cases where
>combine="group" is allowed by this proposal, it has exactly the same
>semantics as combine="interleave".  So we could save ourselves a bunch of
>complexity in the spec and in implementations without forgoing any
>functionality just by getting rid of combine="group" altogether.

Yes, this would work.

>A grammar-level include would also need to be able to contain a <start>
>element to replace any <start> element from the include.

Yes.

Cheers,

Makoto