RE: Minutes for RELAX NG TC 2001-06-14

[Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>]

Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI wrote:
>James then argued that this objective is actually already accomplished
>by the current inference rules.
>I said that is true but that is only because the current inference rule
>is too smart.

Then do we need dumber inference rules? Clearer? Shorter? Backus-Nauer? 

Mike
====
Wy'east Communications     http://www.wyeast.net     mailto:mike@wyeast.net