[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: <optional> vs. <zeroOrOne>
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI wrote: > 1. TREX uses <optional>, so it's natural to use the same keyword, and I > don't see any strong reason to change it. This is not a good argument. One could easily say that there are no strong reasons to change the mechanism (i.e. maxOccurs and minOccurs) of XML Schema. Michael Fitzgerald wrote: > I like the consistency of the second set more. To me, such consistency adds > to the simplicity, ease-of-use, and intuitiveness of RELAX NG. For example, > I think there would be less doubt in a new user's mind over the meaning of > <zeroOrOne> compared to <optional>. We had a vote. Since I do not see any new information, I do not see strong reasons to to revisit the decision. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC