Re: Attribute defaults

[jjc@jclark.com]

We ought to decide as a committee whether we want to produce a 
specification of a set of common annotations.  (If we do, I nominate 
Mike to write it!)

----Original Message-----
   >From:     	Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
   >To:         	RNG List <relax-ng@lists.oasis-open.org>; Murata 
Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
   >Cc:         	
   >Subj:     	Re: Attribute defaults
   >Reply To:     	mike@wyeast.net
   >Sent:    	20 ???????? 2544 14:30
   >
   >Yes, this would be outside the RELAX NG spec. It would come from a 
separate namespace, as James suggested.
   >
   >-Mike
   >
   >---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
   >From: Murata Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
   >Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:42:17 +0900
   >
   >>Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
   >>
   >>> 
   >>> Just a handful of markup for version 1.0 should prove 
sufficient to satisfy
   >>> some important needs.
   >>
   >>Such markups should be separated from the spec of RELAX NG, since 
we do not 
   >>define any semantics for them.  If some spec introduces a:default 
or
   >>a:defaultValue, the spec should define some subset of RELAX NG 
such that 
   >>grammars are unambiguous.
   >>
   >>Cheers,
   >>
   >>Makoto
   >>
   
>>------------------------------------------------------------------
   >>To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single 
word
   >>"unsubscribe" in the body to: 
relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org
   >>
   >
   >------------------------------------------------------------------
   >To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
   >"unsubscribe" in the body to: 
relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org
   >
   >
   >